Chris Kuethe wrote:
> Just wondering what's wrong with the monitor? This morning I had a
> look at my graphs and found an ugly 400ms spike in my offset which of
> course caused me to go diving for my logs. After checking a couple of
> times, I concluded that no, there's nothing wrong with my time server.
> Polling a few nearby time servers, I'm well within network error of
> being synced to these machines.
> 
> I just checked a few other machines and they all have a big spike
> about the same time, and now, like me, they've got an offset of
> serveral tens of ms. Did the monitor box get rebooted or something?
> Maybe it needs to do a bit more internal health-checking?
> 
> CK

Mine had a similar step:
http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/24.20.30.232

Don't read too much into occasional large offsets on the graph, it happens 
periodically. The monitoring system isn't perfect.

Quote from the Pool website: "The monitoring system works roughly like an 
SNTP (RFC 2030) client, so it is more susceptible by random network 
latencies between the server and the monitoring system than a regular ntpd 
client would be. In other words: Don't be alarmed by the occasional large 
offset and please don't use the offset as an absolute performance metric."

Interesting that they all occurred at similar times though, possibly 
indicating a network hiccup at the monitoring site(s).

Dennis

-- 
Dennis Hilberg, Jr.     \  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NTP Server Information:  \  http://saturn.dennishilberg.com/ntp.php
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to