Peter Hessler wrote: > There seems to be a decent amount of interest in IPv6. Maybe we should > start collecting IPv6 addresses for servers, to get some hard numbers on > how many would participate. > I personally run two dual-stacked hosts with a third waiting on technical reasons to join the pool.
In addition to everyone simply posting their addresses/counts to the list, a reverse-dns resolution followed by a forward-dns resolution on the server IPs may turn up a number of IPv6 capable hosts with consistent forward dns for their IPv4 reverse DNS. Obviously this fails for cases where the AAAA and A records are served by different host names or IPv4 reverse DNS is broken or uninformative (like most home connections). _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
