Greetings!

Looking over your situation...

Brian Foddy wrote:
> server  127.127.1.0     # local clock
> fudge   127.127.1.0 stratum 10

I'd probably comment these two lines out.  I believe they're only useful
in cases where you're looking to maintain synchronization in an island
that has no better sources.  Since you've got Internet connectivity, you
can always find a better source.

> restrict ntp3.cs.wisc.edu nomodify
> restrict ntp.sycharlutheran.org nomodify
> restrict clock.nyc.he.net nomodify

I'm also not 100% sure, but I believe "nomodify" would cause the NTP
daemon to not allow these peers to modify your clock, even if they are
specifically listed as servers to poll.

>      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
> ==============================================================================
> *127.127.1.0     .LOCL.          10 l   32   64  377    0.000    0.000   0.977
>  128.105.37.11   128.105.201.11   2 u   26  256  377   64.117  10503.0 3750.77
>  173.16.32.174   99.150.184.201   2 u   18  256  377   58.125  10599.0 3771.55
>  209.51.161.238  .CDMA.           1 u   16  256  377   68.408  14408.1 6707.28

The far left hand column, the one with the * next to 127.127.1.0, is
where you can see what the NTP server thinks about each peer.  In this
case, 127.127.1.0 is the one ntpd loves (*); the others are being
rejected ( ).

Not sure why it didn't break until now.  :-)  -rt

-- 
Ryan Tucker <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Proprietor, Suspension of Disbelief Technologies
Student, MCC Electrical Engineering Technology
http://blog.hoopycat.com/ http://twitter.com/hoopycat

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to