Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
I've contacted the operator of those servers. I also marked all those servers bad.
I see you penalised them all 100 points here: http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/95.140.150.143 But over the weekend, their score has increased again and they're all back in the pool, and still none of them work from source port 123. stream:~ # for i in 193.124.11.11 95.140.150.14{1,2,3} 80.90.180.14{1,2,3} ; do echo $i ; ntpdate -v $i ; done 193.124.11.11 8 Feb 14:51:03 ntpdate[6264]: ntpdate [email protected] Fri Dec 11 14:48:36 UTC 2009 (1) 8 Feb 14:51:07 ntpdate[6264]: no server suitable for synchronization found 95.140.150.141 8 Feb 14:51:07 ntpdate[6265]: ntpdate [email protected] Fri Dec 11 14:48:36 UTC 2009 (1) 8 Feb 14:51:12 ntpdate[6265]: no server suitable for synchronization found 95.140.150.142 8 Feb 14:51:12 ntpdate[6266]: ntpdate [email protected] Fri Dec 11 14:48:36 UTC 2009 (1) 8 Feb 14:51:16 ntpdate[6266]: no server suitable for synchronization found 95.140.150.143 8 Feb 14:51:16 ntpdate[6267]: ntpdate [email protected] Fri Dec 11 14:48:36 UTC 2009 (1) 8 Feb 14:51:20 ntpdate[6267]: no server suitable for synchronization found 80.90.180.141 8 Feb 14:51:20 ntpdate[6268]: ntpdate [email protected] Fri Dec 11 14:48:36 UTC 2009 (1) 8 Feb 14:51:24 ntpdate[6268]: no server suitable for synchronization found 80.90.180.142 8 Feb 14:51:24 ntpdate[6269]: ntpdate [email protected] Fri Dec 11 14:48:36 UTC 2009 (1) 8 Feb 14:51:28 ntpdate[6269]: no server suitable for synchronization found 80.90.180.143 8 Feb 14:51:28 ntpdate[6270]: ntpdate [email protected] Fri Dec 11 14:48:36 UTC 2009 (1) 8 Feb 14:51:32 ntpdate[6270]: no server suitable for synchronization found Andy _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
