Le 04/06/14 16:44, Guus Sliepen a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:25:50PM +0200, Julien Muchembled wrote: > >> Attached a testcase. > > Nice script! > >> This is not a good one because it does not always fail. And any of these 2 >> changes seem to hide the issue: >> - replace "sleep 1" by "sleep 5" >> - remove the 4th node >> >> Hoping it will help. > > I'm afraid I don't get any errors with your script, even after running it many > times. That doesn't mean I don't believe there is a bug, it's just hard to > find... There will be some substantial changes to the new protocol anyway, I > hope they will fix this issue.
:(
I tried to bisect. Last good revision is
> e42bd60 Fix typos in the documentation.
And I get errors with
> c1703ea Remove an unused variable.
I guess there's no point bisecting more, and commit 0da0728 ("Use AES-256-GCM
for the SPTPS protocol") is involved.
Back to latest revision (09e000b): Attached tarballs contains all files
produced by the test I sent in my previous mail. I added microseconds to logs.
ns.test.tar.xz
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tinc mailing list [email protected] http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
