Thanks William. I will look at it and see if i can test it.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:06 AM, William Kennington < [email protected]> wrote: > Just a heads up I'm working on a Nico's module for tinc if you are > interested in testing it. > > https://github.com/wkennington/nixpkgs/tree/master.tincd > > You are going to need my users patch yo add the extra uids needed for this > to work at the moment. > > https://github.com/wkennington/nixpkgs/tree/master.users > > You might also want to check out my addition of the tinc1.1 prerelease. > > https://github.com/wkennington/nixpkgs/tree/master.tinc > > Best, > William > On Aug 26, 2014 11:00 AM, "Zia Syed" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ok i've got it working. >> >> I used the ifconfig command, but removed the netmask and it worked. >> >> like this >> ifconfig $INTERFACE 192.168.1.10 >> >> whereas this didn't work >> ifconfig $INTERFACE 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> >> Thanks guys. >> >> Zia >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Zia Syed <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Guus. That works, but I am still not about to route traffic >>> between the nodes. tinc-up doesn't execute automatically, and when I >>> manually try, i get >>> 'RTNETLINK answers: File exists' >>> for >>> ip addr add 192.168.1.10 dev $INTERFACE >>> >>> where $INTERFACE i pass as eno1. >>> >>> On the tinc debug, i see this >>> >>> Connection with esprit1 (67.169.32.18 port 655) activated >>> Sending ADD_SUBNET to esprit1 (67.169.32.18 port 655): 10 38d07b36 >>> homer2 10.16.0.0/24#10 >>> Sending 35 bytes of metadata to esprit1 (67.169.32.18 port 655) >>> Sending ADD_EDGE to everyone (BROADCAST): 12 7ae0f39b homer2 esprit1 >>> 67.169.32.18 655 c 78 >>> Sending 49 bytes of metadata to esprit1 (67.169.32.18 port 655) >>> Flushing 84 bytes to esprit1 (67.169.32.18 port 655) >>> Got ADD_SUBNET from esprit1 (67.169.32.18 port 655): 10 5dc18841 esprit1 >>> 192.168.1.0/24#10 >>> Forwarding ADD_SUBNET from esprit1 (67.169.32.18 port 655): 10 5dc18841 >>> esprit1 192.168.1.0/24#10 >>> Got ADD_EDGE from esprit1 (67.169.32.18 port 655): 12 1198c2b0 esprit1 >>> homer2 12.249.58.54 655 c 78 >>> Forwarding ADD_EDGE from esprit1 (67.169.32.18 port 655): 12 1198c2b0 >>> esprit1 homer2 12.249.58.54 655 c 78 >>> >>> >>> Does my routing table looks alright? >>> >>> [root@homer2:/etc/tinc/test]# route >>> Kernel IP routing table >>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use >>> Iface >>> default 10.16.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 >>> eno16777728 >>> 10.16.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 >>> eno16777728 >>> 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 >>> eno16777728 >>> >>> [root@homer2:/etc/tinc/test]# ssh [email protected] >>> ssh: connect to host 192.168.1.10 port 22: No route to host >>> >>> [root@esprit1:/etc/tinc/test]# route >>> Kernel IP routing table >>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use >>> Iface >>> default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 202 0 0 >>> eno1 >>> 10.16.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 >>> eno1 >>> 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 202 0 0 >>> eno1 >>> >>> [root@esprit1:/etc/tinc/test]# ssh [email protected] >>> ssh: connect to host 10.16.0.14 port 22: No route to host >>> >>> My host config for homer2 is >>> [root@esprit1:/etc/tinc/test]# cat hosts/homer2 >>> Address = 10.16.0.14 >>> Subnet = 10.16.0.0/24 >>> >>> and for esprit1 >>> >>> [root@homer2:/etc/tinc/test]# cat hosts/esprit1 >>> Address = 67.169.32.18 >>> Subnet = 192.168.1.0/24 >>> >>> thanks, >>> Zia >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Guus Sliepen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 09:55:05PM -0700, Zia Syed wrote: >>>> >>>> > I'm trying to run Tinc on a NixOS machine, using the similar >>>> configuration >>>> > i had for Ubuntu. My home subnet is 192.168.1.0/24 and my work is >>>> > 10.16.0.0/24. However, unlike ubuntu, when I start tincd on nixos, >>>> and try >>>> > to 'ifconfig $INTERFACE 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0' in my >>>> tinc-up, >>>> > I loose network access on the box (no ping/ssh to the box). I see tun0 >>>> > interface created, but no data flows. >>>> > >>>> > eno1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >>>> > inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast >>>> 192.168.1.255 >>>> [...] >>>> > #!/nix/store/ajxd1z42ql9qihdj1pa7in12iynf532g-bash-4.2-p45/bin/sh >>>> > #ifconfig $INTERFACE 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 >>>> > ip route add 10.16.0.0/24 dev $INTERFACE >>>> > ip link set dev $INTERFACE up >>>> >>>> Like Saverio already said, you are configuring tun0 with exactly the >>>> same IP address and netmask as the eno1 interface. This will indeed >>>> cause you to lose network access. You can use the same IP address on >>>> tun0 as on eno1, but then the netmask should be different. Try this >>>> instead: >>>> >>>> #!/nix/store/ajxd1z42ql9qihdj1pa7in12iynf532g-bash-4.2-p45/bin/sh >>>> ip addr add 192.168.1.10 dev $INTERFACE >>>> ip route add 10.16.0.0/24 dev $INTERFACE >>>> ip link set dev $INTERFACE up >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, >>>> Guus Sliepen <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> tinc mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tinc mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc >> >> > _______________________________________________ > tinc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc > >
_______________________________________________ tinc mailing list [email protected] http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
