And how distant are we from a 1.1.0? :)
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Guus Sliepen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 10:33:47AM -0200, Raul Dias wrote:
>
> > I know this comes up from time to time. So it is time to update our
> > expectations.
> >
> > Is there a roadmap for a 1.1 backward compatibility already?
>
> The roadmap looks like this:
>
> 1.1pre1: backwards compatible with 1.0.x
> 1.1pre2: backwards compatible with 1.0.x, but not 1.1pre1
> ...
> 1.1preN: backwards compatible with 1.0.x, but not 1.1pre1 to 1.1pre{N-1}
> 1.1.0: backwards compatible with 1.0.x, but not 1.1pre1 to 1.1preN
> 1.1.1: backwards compatible with 1.0.x, 1.1.y, but not with 1.1pre1 to
> 1.1preN
> ...
> 2.0: not backwards compatible with 1.0.x nor 1.1.y.
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
> Guus Sliepen <[email protected]>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tinc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
>
>
_______________________________________________
tinc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
