On 12 November 2015 at 01:22, fauno <[email protected]> wrote: > btw, +1 for tinc to support upnp, nat-pmp and even stun :)
Mmm. I guess NAT-PMP would be useful indeed - apparently Apple devices (e.g. AirPort) support NAT-PMP but not UPnP (sigh...). STUN is irrelevant here - intermediate publicly addressable tinc nodes (which are required to build a graph that connects nodes behind NATs anyway) de facto fulfill the role of a STUN server (as in, they facilitate relaying and UDP hole punching). _______________________________________________ tinc mailing list [email protected] http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
