I understand the concern of uncertain for TCP-over-TCP by BBR, as the BBR is natively designed to optimize TCP, instead of TCP-over-TCP, but could you articulate a bit more about the beneficial of “sending host when there is a UDP tinc tunnel” in the middle”?
> On 30 Sep 2017, at 11:23 AM, Ryan Mounce <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not aware that BBR claims nor attempts to resolve any of the > inherent issues with TCP-over-TCP. This should still be avoided if > possible. > > TCP BBR would be beneficial if configured on the sending host when > there is a UDP tinc tunnel in the middle. > > On 29 September 2017 at 19:34, Bright Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: >> We knew the TCP-BBR developed by google and try to optimize the transport >> efficiency of TCP, I’m wondering will this be beneficial if we put tinc in >> TCP mode plus the TCP-BBR? >> _______________________________________________ >> tinc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc _______________________________________________ tinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
