tinycc-devel  

Messages by Thread

• [Tinycc-devel] How do I compile for a target system on a mounted partition? broke
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] How do I compile for a target system on a mounted partition? Brian Mayer
• [Tinycc-devel] x86_64-gen: fix missing REX prefix for xor zero into r8-r15 Cyan Ogilvie
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] x86_64-gen: fix missing REX prefix for xor zero into r8-r15 grischka via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] x86_64 incorrect argument passing ABI for mixed structures lemon --- via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Доля Денис
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Доля Денис
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Charles Lohr
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Fix wchar_t definition for FreeBSD/arm64 in tccdefs.h Daniil Gusev
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fix wchar_t definition for FreeBSD/arm64 in tccdefs.h noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fix wchar_t definition for FreeBSD/arm64 in tccdefs.h Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fix wchar_t definition for FreeBSD/arm64 in tccdefs.h noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fix wchar_t definition for FreeBSD/arm64 in tccdefs.h Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
• [Tinycc-devel] regarding the tinycc website Ellie
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] regarding the tinycc website Michael Hewitt via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] regarding the tinycc website Ellie
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] regarding the tinycc website noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] regarding the tinycc website John Mastronardo via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Tinycc bugs Aniruddhan Murali
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tinycc bugs noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Windows ARM64 support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Windows ARM64 support noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] fix(riscv64-asm): use %c for unknown constraint in error message Weixie Cui via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] fix(riscv64-asm): use %c for unknown constraint in error message Weixie Cui via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] patch for -MT option tccq via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] tcc miscompiles binutils 2.46 BFD mmap code path Jamie Magee
• [Tinycc-devel] Fixed-Point AI Runtime: Scaling 1.1B Inference via Pure Python Q4.12 Simulation Dhoko ID
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] riscv64-link: pair pcrel lo relocations by hi address Nav Dian
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] tinycc/os Was: missing roadmap tccq via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] tinycc/os Was: missing roadmap Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] QEMU compilation with i386-tcc passed - Re: tinycc/os Was: missing roadmap Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] qemu and tcc Was: missing roadmap QEMU compilation with i386-tcc passed noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] qemu-0.14.1-hotfix.patch - Re: qemu and tcc Was: missing roadmap QEMU compilation with i386-tcc passed Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] qemu-0.14.1-hotfix.patch - Re: qemu and tcc Was: missing roadmap QEMU compilation with i386-tcc passed tccq via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] qemu-0.14.1-hotfix.patch - Re: qemu and tcc Was: missing roadmap QEMU compilation with i386-tcc passed Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap Eyal Rozenberg via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] Re : The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap david . koch
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap Eyal Rozenberg via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] Re : Re: Re : The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap david . koch
  • [Tinycc-devel] release tag criteria - Re: Re : Re: Re : The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] Re : release tag criteria - Re: Re : Re: Re : The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap david . koch
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] __thread - Re : release tag criteria - Re: Re : Re: Re : The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ARM64 assembler Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Implement ARM64 assembler Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 2/3] asm: Pass ASMOperand to asm_subst_operand backend Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm64-link: Implement TSTBR and CONDBR relocs Aleksi Hannula
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ARM64 assembler Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ARM64 assembler grischka via Tinycc-devel
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] Update about weird behavior with -o flag - RESOLVED Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target Zach van Rijn
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target Sam Ellicott
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] 128bit datatypes - Re: Unable to compile for riscv64 target Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] 128bit datatypes - Re: Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] Protocol for contributing code and documentation. zebbediah beck
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Protocol for contributing code and documentation. Sam Ellicott
• [Tinycc-devel] Update about weird behavior with -o flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Update about weird behavior with -o flag grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Update about weird behavior with -o flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Update about weird behavior with -o flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [solution] error: section type conflict: .note.GNU-stack, 01 <> 07 Mike via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Is there a way to suppress warnings? Simon Sobisch
• [Tinycc-devel] Weird behavior with using -o flag versus running the source immediately with -run flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Apropos cross-build tcc grischka via Tinycc-devel
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] Contributing comments in code. zebbediah beck
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Contributing comments in code. noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Contributing comments in code. Bruno Castro
• [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] slight refactor on x86_64 backend Anon
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] slight refactor on x86_64 backend Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] FreeBSD Unable to build release 0_9_27 Raphael O. via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] FreeBSD Unable to build release 0_9_27 noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? spader via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? Eric Raible
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? Dylan Fei
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? Cyan Ogilvie
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? spader via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] arm64: Fix va_arg stack alignment for 16-byte aligned types Dylan Fei
• [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] arm64: Fix incorrect address calculation for symbols with large addends Dylan Fei
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] arm64: Fix incorrect address calculation for symbols with large addends Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Missing library function in winapi-full-for-0.9.27.zip 椎名 林檎
• [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] aarch64: Fix incorrect unsigned division for pointer difference (TOK_PDIV) Dylan Fei
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] aarch64: Fix incorrect unsigned division for pointer difference (TOK_PDIV) Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] aarch64: Fix incorrect unsigned division for pointer difference (TOK_PDIV) Dylan Fei
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] aarch64: Fix incorrect unsigned division for pointer difference (TOK_PDIV) Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] aarch64: Fix incorrect unsigned division for pointer difference (TOK_PDIV) Dylan Fei
• [Tinycc-devel] I have message when compiling error: ', ' expected (got 'hdrop') Timur Aksenov
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] I have message when compiling error: ', ' expected (got 'hdrop') Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] BUG: libtcc mangles casts of hard-coded pointer values Eric Raible
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] BUG: libtcc mangles casts of hard-coded pointer values Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] BUG: libtcc mangles casts of hard-coded pointer values Eric Raible
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] BUG: libtcc mangles casts of hard-coded pointer values Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] BUG: libtcc mangles casts of hard-coded pointer values Eric Raible
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] BUG: libtcc mangles casts of hard-coded pointer values Eric Raible
• [Tinycc-devel] severe error in tinycc processing function definitions producing mis-compiled binaries Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] severe error in tinycc processing function definitions producing mis-compiled binaries Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] nightly builds - Re: severe error in tinycc processing function definitions producing mis-compiled binaries Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] roadmap - latest nightly builds passed - many issues fixed Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] crossbuild patches - Re: roadmap - latest nightly builds passed - many issues fixed Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] crossbuild patches - Re: roadmap - latest nightly builds passed - many issues fixed grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] crossbuild patches - Re: roadmap - latest nightly builds passed - many issues fixed Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] potential tcc bug discovered when linking kernel with tcc - Re: roadmap - latest nightly builds passed - many issues fixed Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] test case to isolate potential tcc bug when compiling/linking linux-tcc - Re: potential tcc bug discovered when linking kernel with tcc - Re: roadmap - latest nightly builds passed - many issues fixed Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] test case to isolate potential tcc bug when compiling/linking linux-tcc - Re: pote noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] test case to isolate potential tcc bug when compiling/linking linux-tcc - Re: pote Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] tcc -O1/O0 peculiarity with linux-tcc - Re: test case to isolate potential tcc bug when compiling/linking linux-tcc - Re: pote Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] tcc -O1/O0 peculiarity with linux-tcc Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] test case to isolate potential tcc bug when compiling/linking linux-tcc - Re: pote noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 0/1] Keep pointer delta signedness Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 1/1] tccgen: Keep pointer delta signedness Aleksi Hannula
• [Tinycc-devel] recent change to x86_64-asm.h Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] recent change to x86_64-asm.h Aleksi Hannula
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] recent change to x86_64-asm.h Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Detlef Riekenberg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Fred van Kempen via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Charles Lohr
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Sam Ellicott
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Fred van Kempen via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Страхиња Радић
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Running libtcc on iOS Jona Ekenberg
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 0/1] Fix substitution of regvars r8-r15 Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Fix substitution of regvars r8-r15 Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH v2] Fix substitution of regvars r8-r15 Aleksi Hannula
• [Tinycc-devel] problem: repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] problem: repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Страхиња Радић
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] problem: repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Steffen Nurpmeso
  • [Tinycc-devel] Fix for 6da45946 Add bound check support for alloca on all targets on AMD64 Henry Kroll via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] problem: repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Eric Wong
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] problem: repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] problem: repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] problem: repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Jan Krüger
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] problem: repo.or.cz now uses Anubis merde Steffen Nurpmeso
• [Tinycc-devel] Interesting error report while attempting to compile TCC with C99 or C11 flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Interesting error report while attempting to compile TCC with C99 or C11 flag arnold
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Interesting error report while attempting to compile TCC with C99 or C11 flag noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Interesting error report while attempting to compile TCC with C99 or C11 flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Interesting error report while attempting to compile TCC with C99 or C11 flag noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Interesting error report while attempting to compile TCC with C99 or C11 flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Implement alloca for RISC-V Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Implement alloca for RV64 Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Simplify RV64 function epilogue Aleksi Hannula
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Implement alloca for RISC-V Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] __attribute__ ((__packed__)) does not work as expected [email protected]
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] __attribute__ ((__packed__)) does not work as expected Liam Wilson
  • [Tinycc-devel] __attribute__ ((__packed__)) does not work as expected Stefanos Sofroniou via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] #include <stdio.h> implicitly includes <stddef.h> Keith Thompson
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] #include <stdio.h> implicitly includes <stddef.h> noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] #include <stdio.h> implicitly includes <stddef.h> Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] #include <stdio.h> implicitly includes <stddef.h> noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] #include <stdio.h> implicitly includes <stddef.h> Detlef Riekenberg via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] -nostdlib -run issue: Arguments are not passed on the stack for the entry point DFP via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] -nostdlib -run issue: Arguments are not passed on the stack for the entry point Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] -nostdlib -run issue: Arguments are not passed on the stack for the entry point DFP via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] -nostdlib -run issue: Arguments are not passed on the stack for the entry point Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] -nostdlib -run issue: Arguments are not passed on the stack for the entry point grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] -nostdlib -run issue: Arguments are not passed on the stack for the entry point Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] -nostdlib -run issue: Arguments are not passed on the stack for the entry point Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] -nostdlib -run issue, 'incompatible types' warning DFP via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Two issues with -nostdlib: undefined symbol '__va_arg', and undefined macro __STDC_HOSTED__ DFP via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Two issues with -nostdlib: undefined symbol '__va_arg', and undefined macro __STDC_HOSTED__ Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] error: 'FLT_EVAL_METHOD' undeclared Eric Wong
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] error: 'FLT_EVAL_METHOD' undeclared noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Non-free test file 46_grep.c Matteo Cypriani
• [Tinycc-devel] Syntax error in first TCCState breaks subsequent TCCStates Eric Raible
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Syntax error in first TCCState breaks subsequent TCCStates Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Syntax error in first TCCState breaks subsequent TCCStates Eric Raible
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Syntax error in first TCCState breaks subsequent TCCStates Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] Memory leak on token error during macro argument substitution Lioric Z3
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] Memory leak on token error during macro argument substitution Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] Memory leak on token error during macro argument substitution Lioric Z3
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] Memory leak on token error during macro argument substitution Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird behavior with __attribute__((cleanup(<func_name>))) Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] Weird behavior with __attribute__((cleanup(<func_name>))) Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird behavior with __attribute__((cleanup(<func_name>))) noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel

• Earlier messages