Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > KHMan wrote: >> Maintainers welcome, otherwise I will just act as a pull monkey or >> a braindead commit monkey for now. I don't know enough to do QC or >> judge patches. Please post patches to this list only and let >> members of the list decide whether the patches are any good. Even >> Rob, if he wants to participate, is very much welcome. > > Very cool! You effort is appreciated! > > If would be nice if there was a possibility to create additional repos > within the registered one, basically for everybody contributing one to > push his local changes. But maybe that's too much for now :)
This can actually be done, I think, with branches, as long as there is no anonymous pushing. The ShareSource interface is pretty basic for now, but that also made it possible to get one started very quickly. And importing into the Mercurial repository is very nice. Very nice. You know, someone should lobby to get git and hg services on Google Code. That'll be heaven. :-) AFAIK, Rob's tree has no branches, I checked the log. But for anyone wishes to hack on tcc (or has been doing so for a while now), I think having branches is a good idea. At least there is no need to maintain one's own server. I'm all for it. Would you like developer access? Just sign on as a ShareSource member and drop me a note. Since this is supposed to be an unofficial (and unstable) tree, I think we can be more permissive in terms of developers' access. Create branches for experimental work. The more redundancy the better. :-) -- Cheers, Kein-Hong Man (esq.) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
