Variable length arrays are valid C99. On Wednesday 17 June 2009 07:01:15 Christian Jullien wrote: > If tcc is supposed to compile ISO C, it is right to complain. > If tcc wants to compile all what gcc compiles it has to support all gcc > extensions as the one you're using with this sample. > > IMHO a compiler should compile all valid code as determined by a standard > (in our case different published versions ISO/IEC 9899 standard) and reject > all other forms. So, tcc does the right job in your case. > > If you're bound to a specific language extension you're also bound a > specific compiler and you'll easily compile your code on another compiler. > > You'd better rewrite your code so that is complies with the C standard > level/version you want to support. > > C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=wanadoo...@nongnu.org > [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=wanadoo...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of > Ammar James > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 21:54 > To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: [Tinycc-devel] tcc and declaring arrays. > > Another area where gcc compiles fine while tcc issues an error. > > Essentially: > int i; > i = strlen(s); > int s2[i]; //tcc doesn't like this. > > tcc's error message is: wrong3.c:9: constant expression expected > > Code attached (21 lines). > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >- ----------- > Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail. > Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
