Ah, I understand now why this makes it not a priority. Of course I can probably get it working, but at what cost to the tiny C codebase.
I'll have to think carefully before I dive in. Bill. 2009/12/7 grischka <[email protected]>: > Bill Hart wrote: >> >> Yasm runs on linux and Windows and is becoming more popular. If tcc >> also happens to assemble yasm code, then that is another way to >> support both projects, no? >> >> The main reason it would be useful to me is that the Windows 64 >> assembler code in MPIR is in yasm format. >> >> Anyhow if it is only useful to me, I guess I won't bother with it. > > Feel free. I just wondered how far one can get with yasm compatibility, > seen that for instance tcc simply uses the C parser and preprocessor > for the assembler, or that forward jump distance calculation would > require some intermediate code representation that tcc does not have. > It's not that I don't like the idea. > > ---grischka > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
