On Friday 29 January 2010 23:53:41 grischka wrote: > but I once came > to the conclusion that this (more or less implicit) design is > probably not really suited to produce correct behavior under any > circumstances. > That does not mean that it needs to be more complex necessarily, > but it seems that it needs to be different, somehow.
I agree. > > While trying to feed tcc with output from the GNU preprocessor I fixed > > this trivial bug: > > Please push patches on our "mob" branch ;) > http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git I will. :) -- Alexandre _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
