Le mardi 20 avril 2010 21:16:52, grischka a écrit : > RoboTux wrote: > > I also changed the load/save_buffer_state horrible hack into a dynarray > > approach. Take a look at the code, I'm sure you'll be happy with it. > > Yes, happy! > > I guess these 6 lines: > file_name = tcc_malloc(sizeof(char) * (strlen(filename) + 1)); > strcpy(file_name, filename); > dynarray_add((void ***) &libs, &nblibs, file_name); > lib_name = tcc_malloc(sizeof(char) * (strlen(libname) + 1)); > strcpy(lib_name, libname); > dynarray_add((void ***) &libs, &nblibs, lib_name); > > are logically equal to these 2 lines: > dynarray_add((void ***) &libs, &nblibs, tcc_strdup(filename)); > dynarray_add((void ***) &libs, &nblibs, tcc_strdup(libname)); > > But then again I'm a perfectionist ;)
Not at all, you're perfectly right. I wasn't aware of these function, else I would have used them. I correct this right after this mail. When upgrading master to mob, do you simply merge mob in master or do you clean up things and squash commits ? > > --- grischka > Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
