The Thursday 22 April 2010 14:35:50, RoboTux wrote : [SNIP] > > But now I'm really not sure it would work. If it's provided by gcc then > there is a good chance that it's really compiler-dependant. Except if code > compiled by tcc and gcc looks the same, I don't think we could link > against libgcc_eh.a It seems to me the only solution is to implement in > some way the function on the tcc side.
Alternatively I've just found it exists a library for that: libunwind (43380 lines of code). We could link against libunwind if found on the system and use dummy function (and thus display a warning if compiling statically) if not. Still, we must implements __gcc_personality_v0 and I have no idea of what it does. > > > --- grischka > > > > > Thomas Preud'homme > > Hope I'm clear and I'm not confused myself. > Cheers.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
