> Basile, > > Do you have any thoughts about implementing a minimalistic C++ extension > to TinyCC, specifically that includes only the class, public/ protected/ > private, inheritance, member functions (virtual or no), and that's > basically it? > > The idea would be the encapsulation of the base C++ design, but without > all the bloat, the ability to create a quick application that would > compile under any C++ compiler, but using only these features. > > Any thoughts? And I realize you may be busy right now. Please respond > when you can. Thanks! > > - Rick C. Hodgin >
That would be an interesting extension or wrapper. I would be happy enough with c99 compliance, to wit VLA's. _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
