Le mardi 17 mai 2011 21:56:46, grischka a écrit : > Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > [...] > > So to summarize, I think lots of improvements have been done in tinycc > > since last stable version and I think it's ready for a new release, > > although I'd appreciate the struct_assign_test to be fixed before that > > if possible. > > > > What do you think Grischka? > > Yes, much appreciated. > > One thing to think about is Changelog, to have say the most important > user visible changes since last release. Though I think the list is > long enough already so probably some less important lines can be removed, > also. I updated the Changelog a bit, see last commit.
I would certainly remove the entry about support for indirect functions as external if needed. It's a very small patch which doesn't deserve credit. I put it here in the first place only because lots of questions were asked on the ML about this. > > Anyway, I do not plan to review commits again this time so we will just > go with current "mob" state as is, unless otherwise suggested. Maybe for next branch we could help you by using some home-made tagging, like Fix: commit_sha1 lines. This way you know which commit to merge (and you would take the commit message of the first commit in a chain). I should be relatively easy to write a script to automate that. > > Thanks, > > --- grischka Best regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
