Rob Landley wrote:
The part I boggle at is that you honestly believe that single character global function names are a good idea, which scale to large codebases. This is one of many reasons why I think your technical judgement sucks.
Well, code has a function and a message and the message with, for example, o(0x50) is: Do not touch this unless you know what you're doing. Check your judgment why it missed that message.
I do a thing, you respond the next day, and you offer this as evidence that you _weren't_ responding to my actions? Ok...
Sure I was reacting. Because with your change of the license it was clear that your fork was going to nowhere.
You've already established that you never understood what I was trying to do. You already told me this back in 2009:
Right. I was trying to be polite. --- grischka _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
