> Apart from that: does github have kind of like mob branches by default? > Because, quite frankly, that's the only reason I contributed anything, > however small, back to tinycc. If it hadn't I still would have had fun for a > weekend fixing tcc, just > > > without anybody gaining anything from it, as > my patches would have never seen anybody else, and nobody would have seen > them.
Github makes it easy to collaborate with public visible pull requests. http://help.github.com/send-pull-requests/ > Higher google rank, >> Huh? So you think google is giving points for github, but not >> for repo.or.cz (the best), or gitorious or any of the others? Proof? Github makes it easy for Google to index the important information. Good SEO overall :D > nice readme, >> Doesn't write itself, no matter the VCS. So how does a new VCS magically >> help? Github makes the README prominent readable on the "front-page" of the repository. Much less visible with repo.or.cz > easier forks >> Well, I'm not exactly fluent in git (actually I hate its usability, which is >> next to non-existent), but what's difficult with "git checkout -b"? Public visible fork networks: https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/network > etc. You could use Travis.CI (http://travis-ci.org/) as continuous integration service. Organization Examples: https://github.com/luvit/luvit https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive Kind regards, Karl Skomski On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Michael Matz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Mon, 14 May 2012, Karl Skomski wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I discovered tinycc some days ago but only today I discovered the >> current development repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git It's >> not that easy to find the most-updated tinycc repository. >> >> I thought maybe it would be nice to switch the tinycc repository to a >> github organization? > > > How exactly would that help spreading interest (except in github)? > > Apart from that: does github have kind of like mob branches by default? > Because, quite frankly, that's the only reason I contributed anything, > however small, back to tinycc. If it hadn't I still would have had fun for a > weekend fixing tcc, just without anybody gaining anything from it, as my > patches would have never seen anybody else, and nobody would have seen them. > >> Higher google rank, > > > Huh? So you think google is giving points for github, but not for repo.or.cz > (the best), or gitorious or any of the others? Proof? > >> nice readme, > > > Doesn't write itself, no matter the VCS. So how does a new VCS magically > help? > >> easier collaborating, > > > How exactly easier than today? > >> easier forks > > > Well, I'm not exactly fluent in git (actually I hate its usability, which is > next to non-existent), but what's difficult with "git checkout -b"? > >> etc. > > > Aha. > > > Ciao, > Michael. > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
