Le dimanche 10 juin 2012 12:09:37, Daniel Glöckner a écrit : > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 09:15:52AM +0200, Michael Matz wrote: > > Thomas: as you were last fiddling with arm, you might want to check > > if the test works on it. The other alloca testcase is #ifdef'ed on > > i386 and x86_64, but that only makes sense if alloca really isn't > > supported on arm, which I can't believe. If that really is the case > > callsave_test() needs to be conditional too. > > Some time ago I posted an alloca version for ARM: > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2011-02/msg00046.html > but we don't build a libtcc1 for ARM and libgcc/libc don't provide > alloca as it is a GCC builtin. Should a libtcc1 be built on ARM then? If not, I guess a define on ARM would do it but it would not be clean.
> > Daniel Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
