On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:23:25PM +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > Le jeudi 6 décembre 2012 04:50:55, vous avez écrit : > > > > > > Hi Kirill, > > > > > > did you make any progress on the issue since Daniel's comments? Could you > > > let me know when you push a patch so that I can test it and bump master > > > to equal the mob branch? > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Unfortunately not that much. I was trying to investigate > > bounds-checking failures for `tcc -b -run tcc ...` tests first and it looks > > I'm close to understand what is going on (old bcheck code is not adapted > > to /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space = 2). The plan was to go to arm > > issues then, but I'm going very slow, because for tcc I have only 15-20 > > minutes per day and it is all in underground. Sorry. Could this issue > > please wait me for some time? (probably week or so...) > > That's a worthwhile bug to fix
Also grischka writes: > btest is not a feature that we can't recommend to use > really (at least as long as tcc -btest tcc.c doesn't produce anything > useful), FYI, as of mob a55ecf6d it now does, so please don't treat -b mode as second class citizen anymore. Thanks, Kirill P.S. sorry for another empty mail - replying through gmane did not work for me... _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
