Hi, On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> No, again you're right. I got over zealous in trying to address anything > that was shown to me. I should have taken the cautious approach _Especially_ when it was the result of some automatic checker like Coverity. (Just one anecdotical evidence: our security team eventually stopped using Coverity regularly to check the code base, simply because filtering out false positive, or senseless style nits was more work than what was saved by it). > and later look at all the surrounding code. Thanks for your vigilance ;) Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
