You wrote:
fixed pasto in in 108b2876; background for the additional $CC test is: GCC_MAJOR may be set even is $CC not realy gcc (but i.e. clang, which (as of 3.1) requires an addtional CFLAG to accept the non portable (gnuisms all over the place; try to cimpile tcc with Sun^HOracle, Intel, Pathscale, ... compiler) code).
Using "-fheinous-gnu-extensions" for clang makes sense but I still don't see how "GCC_MAJOR may be set even is $CC not realy gcc"??? Thanks, --- grischka _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
