Le lundi 26 août 2013 13:07:37 Jens Nyberg a écrit : > Hi! > > I think implementing .set and .equ which are both functionally > equivalent would be a easy task unless someone is already working on > this? > > If I implement it myself I assume what they do would be to define a > symbol with a value and that's it. Or am I missing something? > > And also, there is no reason for why these are not supported besides > lack of time?
As most (all?) FLOSS project, there is difinitely a lack of time / manpower to work on TinyCC. The number of feature request and bug report is currently increasing and there seem to be no progress so far. There is a few bugs and improvement I'd like to work on myself for a long time but don't have time to work on for various reason. If you feel you can do it then please go ahead and feel free to ask questions. Help is more than welcome :) Best regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
