Hi Daniel, If I understand you well, you want to change RELICENSING file From Daniel Glöckner ? arm-gen.c To Daniel Glöckner NO arm-gen.c
On my side, I prefer a clear NO than a '?' If I've really no objection about your choice (I respect). What can we do if we want an ARM backend having BSD Like license? - rewrite from scratch - dual license (either LGPL or BSD Like). I know many projects having dual license. - you allow tcc projet to make a fork, arm-gen.c -> arm-bsd-gen.c (and maybe ./configure choose one or the other --bsd-only for example) Do you see other possible solution, what do you advice? Christian -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Glöckner Sent: samedi 4 janvier 2014 10:27 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] linking tinycc On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 10:08:09AM +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > I don't think law has determined whether copyright is per file or more > fined grained but it shouldn't make a big difference in the case of > tcc. Files are usually mainly contributed by 1 or 2 big contributors > and the rest are small patches that probably don't have copyright on their own (IANAL though). FWIW I'm fine with relicensing all my contributions to files other than arm-gen.c to the BSD license reproduced in RELICENSING. Daniel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
