Hi Christian Jullien! > I'm really afraid to see discussion on about to optimize Cfront tcc backend! There is no such discussion. But Basile and you trying to say tcc is not a real compiler, a tcc can not be used to perform some task. Only because it is not a optimizer compiler. This is not true. We don't need an optimizer compiler all the time. Some words from the MELT build instructions: - 6 GByte of the RAM - 20 minutes for build Only because a C++ must be compiled
> It has the reputation to be slower than C and, in some sense, it is true when > used by > non-highly experimenter C++ programmers. (In real life, C++ can outperform C > - I have code that run >2x as fast in C++ --thanks to templates-- than in C). I looked in OW STL some words about comparison a C++ way programming with plain C: in some cases C++ slower a plain C by 1.5 It is not a fail of the "highly expnon-erimented C++ programmers". But yes: C++ can be as fast as a plain C if you don't use C++ features or use only a templates w/o classes. PS: I can't fast find this article: a test was a C way list and iterators against a C++ list, iterators and so... _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
