If you would look at the shared funding projects, you would notice that the 
funding meter disappeared too. It makes me conclude that people who share 
funded the projects were actually fooled by "editor" :). They bought a license, 
just like the proprietary software. It seems that Tiny are not going to release 
them, or will do only when there is a free alternative.

It is obvious that nobody are going to implement ERP system for period of year 
or a little more, so inevitably one will have to migrate to new versions...

If one have to buy a last small screw to make the whole mechanism run reliably, 
it is no difference when you have to buy a whole mechanism.

This behavior cripples free software spirit as a whole, and gives all the aces 
to the defenders of proprietary software. There is no benefit from ERP if you 
can not run it for more than a year or two. One can call this as a service - on 
eBay there is common practice that product costs little to nothing but the 
shipping costs as much as the ordinary product +shipping. The catch is that 
shipping is not refundable when the product is not what you intend it to be. I 
am not saying that OpenERP is bad, I am just describing business model.

I would not pay for this script to the Tiny, it is better to make one "in 
house" or share fund it. Else there will come more and more such scripts for 
which you'll have to pay just like for an ordinary license.

sraps

-------------------------------------
http://kndati.lv




-------------------- m2f --------------------

--
http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=39107#39107

-------------------- m2f --------------------


_______________________________________________
Tinyerp-users mailing list
http://tiny.be/mailman2/listinfo/tinyerp-users

Reply via email to