> To be constructive? I tried to be it, perhaps without the result you (and me) > would for me, I let you the last answer if you want, I will follow what you > say, I will transform me like most people to an ostrich.
I wouldn't call myself an ostrich, nor the other people who are trying to use and make prosper the attractive tool. People with loud voice and clear position always lead others, who are not so confident. If you would do nothing, you would be an ostrich. If you make fuss, you are going to sabotage remaining part of this site which belongs to community, as well as make bad image of the whole project. We are working on this project as other people do, trying to make living on it. We are trying to get the software better, but we are not going to promote Tiny, nor their partners, because they are not about fair play. They benefit from visibility (free marketing and promotion), testing, bugfixing and so on, still trying to squeeze profit out of the community which make all of that. Before someone try to argue, that they develop the code, find statistical breakdownn of software life cycle costing... Tryton made fork, but this is not the best solution to the problem. To my opinion it is better to make strong independent external community around existing OpenERP. Editor will not be able to do anything about it, then they will be forced to play by the same rules as other contributors. Maybe they would become leaders among equals, or be the somewhere there in the past, but not at the ignorant position as they are now. It would be better if you realize your eager in a more effective way. Kaspars -------------------- m2f -------------------- -- http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=39807#39807 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman2/listinfo/tinyerp-users
