Dear All,
Just I wanted to understand about exact reasons for not to include
dynamic memory allocation and function pointers in nesC.
One reason: Usage of function pointers makes deadcode elimination
difficult.
I am not able to get any other reasons......
I would request you to please give me some pointers/details about
the same...
I went through the paper "An holistic approach.."
Manjunath
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Philip Levis wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Jon wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know how to implement SendData.nc properly into an
> > application?
> >
> > I am trying to use it as part of TOSBase but I keep getting no match
> > in the configuration file and I cant find the module for the SendData
> > interface.
>
> SendData was intended for a very narrow use case, sending raw data
> bytes over the UART. It was used before the java-side mig/packet
> libraries, when Java apps still parsed packets as byte arrays. When
> FramerM supplanted the old UART stack, it was pulled out of use.
>
> Phil
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-help mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
