On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 12:21 -0800, Leo Szumel wrote: > >I'm looking into this. > > > > > > > Awesome, thanks. > > >I think the problem lies in the telosb.vmsf sensorboard file, which was > >introduced in 2.2.2; before then, you just used the telos.vmsf > >sensorboard file. > > > >The only major difference I can imagine between the two is that telosb > >passes -mmcu=msp430x1611 while telos passes msp430x149. > > > > > > > I suspected the same thing, and tried changing the mmcu flag, to no avail. >
> >I'm using nesc 1.1.3, and it seems to work fine... I am going to roll > >back to 1.1.2 and see what happens. > > > > > FYI my buddy who has a similar environment is using nesC > 1.1.1-something, and it works for him. Yeah, I've rolled back to nesC 1.1.2, and am using the 1.1.14 TinyOS snapshot, and it seems to work fine for me. > Note in my next post that the key factor seems to be the presence of > "-I[...]/platform/telosb"--remove that arg, replace 'telosb' with > 'telos', or otherwise make 'telosb' not appear, and it compiles. Doesn't > seem to matter what is in the telosb directory at all--I even tried > copying telos/ into telosb/. What copy did you do? Did it include the .platform file? (E.g., if you rm telosb and symlink telos to telosb, do you see the same behavior?) Can you pass -v to the make and send me the output? That way, I can see what options are going where. Phil _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
