Is there any rule based on which you could suggest who might look into
switching to 2.0 yet and who could have a look but should probably wait
because it's too soon?
For instance concerning the different platforms: mica2, micaz, telosb ...
and maybe concerning something like module-related, specific things ...
can't think of anything but probably there are some things that are
known to be not really "stable" or fixed in design yet so that switching
is not really recommended for now or the near future.
Martin
Kristin Wright wrote:
The TinyOS 2.0 Working Group is pleased to announce the release of
TinyOS 2.0 Beta1. We think you'll find 2.x even better designed,
better documented, more portable and more reliable than TinyOS 1.x.
You can read documents on how to upgrade from TinyOS 1.x (while saving
your 1.x tree if preferred):
http://www.tinyos.net/scoop/special/working_group_tinyos_2-0
or install TinyOS 2.0.0 beta1 fresh:
http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/html/install-tinyos.html
2.0 Beta1 is the result of tremendous effort put forth by the TinyOS
2.0 Working: David Gay, Phil Levis, Vlado Handziski, Kristin Wright,
Jan-Hinrich Hauer, Ben Greenstein, Martin Turon, Jonathan Hui, Kevin
Klues, Cory Sharp, Robert Szewczyk, Joe Polastre, Philip Buonadonna,
Lama Nachman, Wei Hong, Gilman Tolle, David Culler and Adam Wolisz.
-kw
_______________________________________________
Tinyos mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
