On May 2, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Michael Schippling wrote:
While we're on the subject of broken CC1000's...
I was originally mostly unsuccessful in using the 'standard' TOS mica2
radio until an xbow engineer directed me to the contrib/xbow tree.
I assumed that all that xbow/tos/CC1000* code was my savior. However,
just recently I found that it too uses the 'standard' code (as far
as I
can understand my reverse engineering of the compile sequence anyway).
Do you know if the difference is just the more convenient make defines
and a higher default xmit power?
Perhaps the default frequency?
Phil
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
