Hi Phil, The improvements you mention seems very reasonable. I would be interested to know/see how the network/nodes will react when the topology is changed (i.e. the motes moved around or connection is lost between some of them). Will it sacrifice reliability by the time the motes discover their new neighbors?
Thanks, Bulut On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Philip Levis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 13, 2008, at 3:13 PM, John Frye wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have several motes collecting data and communicating through the > > provided collection and dissemination protocol implementations in > > the net library. However, the battery life on these motes is quite > > poor; they only last for around a week and half. I attempted to > > implement low power listening as shown in the tutorial, but to no > > significant gain. > > > > Consequently, I was thinking about tweaking the collection > > implementation to see if there was any sort of possible gain. How > > is the routing table updated? Are period messages sent to neighbors? > > If so, is there a constant or value I can modify to decrease the > > frequency of these messages? > > > > I would very much appreciate answers to these questions or other > > suggestions. > > The version of CTP in CVS is not well designed for low-power, because > it uses excessive control traffic. The work up to 2.0.2 (and what's in > CVS) focused on making the data path as efficient as possible: in many > cases CTP sends 25% fewer data packets than MultihopLQI, with either > equivalent or much higher reliability. Not much attention was paid to > how often control packets were sent. > > There is work in net2 going on right now to bring down the control > traffic: the test version (not checked in) cuts control traffic by a > factor of 10. When the network starts up, it sends more control > packets as it discovers the topology and adapts. Over a few hours, it > settles down. In our experiments, it sends more control traffic than > MLQI for the first ten minutes or so, but after a few hours it's > sending at 1/2 -1/4 the rate. > > Om is working on this right now, and David Moss has been examining how > it interacts with LPL. We hope to check in the changes in the next few > weeks. > > Phil > _______________________________________________ > Tinyos-help mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help >
_______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
