On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:16 AM, Alban Hessler wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Digging deeper into CpmModelC, I think there is missing a safety
> statement in the shouldReceive function.
>
> I think many people use the link gain generator based on a topology
> file (see TOSSIM tutorial on the wiki). The tool output a link gain
> for every pair of nodes in the network, thus the SNR for some of these
> links is negative (for nodes that are very far apart).
>
> Alas, the CpmModelC file in TOSSIM does not check that, and even call
> the PER function for such a SNR, which obviously should never yield a
> successfully decoded packet (the receiver would not even sync on the
> preamble, since it's just noise..).
>
> The effect is that it creates wormholes, specially with extremly bad
> links. i.e. WIth a SNR of -50 db, the probability of passing the
> packet is 1 %. Here is an excerpt of the CpmModel output:
>
> DEBUG (33): SNR is 3.520000, PRR is 0.066555
> DEBUG (29): SNR is 0.600000, PRR is 0.000001
> DEBUG (27): SNR is -25.840000, PRR is 0.010087
> DEBUG (26): SNR is 6.990000, PRR is 0.877191
> DEBUG (28): SNR is 15.200000, PRR is 1.000000
> DEBUG (32): SNR is -12.300000, PRR is 0.007021
> DEBUG (31): SNR is -13.620000, PRR is 0.007780
>
> Simple fix would be to check the SNR for positivity before calling the
> rather computationally expensive prr_estimate_from_snr() function. Any
> negative SNR should yield a probability of zero for receiving the
> packet.
>
> Please, can someone confirm what I just stated?

Well, technically, it is not 0.... There are physical layers which can  
receive packets with an SNR < 0dB. In very controlled conditions, for  
example, 802.11 at 1Mbps. Take a look at the SIGCOMM 2005 Roofnet  
measurement study.

I am leery of putting in a special case. But if you have a better  
function, then I'd be happy to replace what's in there now. I think  
it's safe to say that efficiency was not a big concern when I  
implemented it.

Phil
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help

Reply via email to