I found the root of the problem.

   1. /opt/tinyos-2.x/tos/lib/net/Deluge/extra/mica2/NetProg_platform.h
   calls the hardware specific function wdt_enable() directly.
   2. /opt/tinyos-2.x/tos/lib/net/Deluge/extra/avr/InternalFlashC.nc calls
   the hardware specific functions eeprom_is_read(), eeprom_write_byte(), and
   eeprom_read_byte() directly.

There are no TOSSIM-equivalent implementations of these functions. Hence,
TOSSIM support for DelugeT2 remains unavailable.



2009/3/23 Yee Wei Law <[email protected]>

> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks very much for your help. I have downloaded the code from your git
> repository. Although the application Block *(apps/tests/storage/Block*)
> compiles successfully, I am still having several problems with Blink *
> (apps/tests/deluge/Blink)*. The most serious problem of all is the
> following:
>
> /usr/include/unistd.h:238: conflicting types for `intptr_t'
> /usr/avr/include/stdint.h:142: previous declaration of `intptr_t'
> In file included from /opt/tinyos-2.x/tos/chips/at45db/sim/At45dbC.nc:43,
>
> The file */usr/include/unistd.h* is included by TOSSIM whereas the file *
> /usr/avr/include/stdint.h* is included by tos/chips/at45db/sim/At45dbP.nc.
> What I haven't figured out is why this is not a problem for Block, but is a
> problem for Blink.
>
> Might you have an idea?
>
> Best regards,
> Yee Wei
>
> 2009/3/20 Chieh-Jan (Mike) Liang <[email protected]>
>
> The TOSSIM I have in my GIT repository might be helpful to you. Here is
>> what I sent to the mailing list a while ago,
>> http://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/pipermail/tinyos-help/2008-December/037688.html
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Mar 18, 2009, at 10:49 PM, Yee Wei Law wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Razvan,
>>>
>>> Continuing this thread from last year, I have spent some time finding a
>>> way to simulate DelugeT2 on TOSSIM. My understanding is there are two main
>>> difficulties: (1) the storage, (2) the radio. The following summarizes my
>>> (unsuccessful) experience so far:
>>>
>>> The storage
>>> The make rule for TOSSIM is in $TOSROOT/support/make/sim.extra, which
>>> does not depend on the target 'build_storage', hence the storage-related
>>> files are never generated. This is easy to solve:
>>>        • First, do a "make micaz" to have the storage-related files
>>> generated, and copy all the files (which most importantly include the header
>>> file StorageVolumes.h) from build/micaz to simbuild/micaz
>>>        • Replace the value of SPM_PAGESIZE in
>>> $TOSROOT/extra/micaz/TOSBoot_platform.h with 256 (the value "256" can be
>>> gleaned from the generated file build/micaz/app.c)
>>>        • Modify the file BlockStorageManager/BlockStorageManagerC.nc to
>>> use FakeBlockReaderC and FakeBlockWriterC instead of BlockStorageC
>>> The radio
>>> This is where I got stuck. The file extra/NetProgC.nc uses CC2420Config
>>> explicitly, what should we use to substitute for CC2420Config?
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Yee Wei
>>>
>>> 2008/8/27 Razvan Musaloiu-E. <[email protected]>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Ning "Martin" Xu wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I wonder if there's any support for external flash memory content
>>> > simulation with Tossim for MicaZ motes in TinyOS 2.x. Would somebody
>>> > give me some instructions on this? Thank you.
>>>
>>> I'm not aware of any Tossim support for storage but you can try to use
>>> the
>>> FakeBlockReaderC and FakeBlockWriterC from tos/lib/net/Deluge to avoid
>>> using the real storage.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Razvan ME
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tinyos-help mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tinyos-help mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help

Reply via email to