In my simple tests years ago I found about the same 100 msg/sec
using all the standard T1 mechanisms without ACKs:
http://www.etantdonnes.com/Motes/report_micaz/
Perhaps hacking the MAC layer will improve things, but might also
reduce reliability and crosstalk rejection.
MS
Philip Loden wrote:
> 2009/6/18 Philip Loden <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing experiments related to a voice-over-WSN application.
> In "T2: A Second Generation OS for Embedded Sensor Networks" it
> states that the MicaZ is capable of sending at a rate of nearly
> 400 pps. I've been able to achieve only about 100 pps on the
> TelosB under TinyOS-2.1.0. I'm basically using AMSenderC and
> calling send from within sendDone. Any thoughts or suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Philip
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-help mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>
> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Jeonghoon Kang
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> If you can hack under AMSenderC layer, inside MAC code,
> Telosb can achieve around 400 pps.
>
> TelosB and MicaZ are using CC2420 Radio.
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply. I'll start hacking on this. If anyone else has
> alreading done it, I'd appreciate a look at the code.
>
> Philip
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-help mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
