Hi,
Thanks for the information. I'll look into MintRoute.
But the sendEst part looks like a bug to me. Logically, unless I'm
not able to piece it together and its being correctly handled
somewhere else, sendEst should be right-shifted, rather than
left-shifted.
What do you think?
Regards,
Bharat.
On 7/31/09, Omprakash Gnawali <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:36 PM, bharat naik<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks Om.
>>
>> I was thinking of using receiveEst to centre on a node failure. As
>> you
>> correctly pointed out, it takes time. Specifically, it took 3 minutes for
>> the receiveEst to be decreased exponentially. However, other than failure
>> is
>> there any other case where receiveEst may decrease exponentially, except
>> say a lossy link.
>> Secondly, in MultiHopLEPSM, in the updateEst() function, if
>> liveliness
>> decreases below a threshold, it does: Nbr->sendEst <<= 1; However, if
>> it
>> left shifts sendEst, won't its value increase? Later we check if sendEst
>> <
>> 25, to choose a parent. Isn't this contradictory?
>
> You can look at the corresponding function in MintRoute, which is a
> more modern code. But even MintRoute is several years old and the
> contributor is probably no longer supporting the code.
>
> - om_p
>
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
