Dear Yess, On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Yee Wei Law <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Miklos, > > The latest CVS still has the same problem, namely if I don't enable either > PACKET_LINK or TFRAMES_ENABLED, then the transmission is still slow. May I > ask what the drawback of enabling either PACKET_LINK or TFRAMES_ENABLED is?
No drawback, but the different behavior hides a bug somewhere and I am not sure where. Can you also check the latest CVS now (update everything, not just the chips directory). > I will test the pre-overhaul version of the tos/chips/rf2xx directory later, > I promise. Ok, that would be also nice to know if this is a recent problem or has been there before. Since TFRAMES_ENABLE fixes things, it could be related to the packet layout. If TFRAMES_ENABLE is not defined, then we simultaneously support the ActiveMessageC and Ieee154MessageC and we have an extra 6lowpan network byte. Maybe the problem is the interaction of the serial and radio stacks. Miklos _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
