Hi Mark, Work with the latest version from of tinyos-2.x from the CVS. Interfaces have been changed since tinyos-2.1.0
Best, Miklos On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Mark Patrick Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Miklos, > > I use the SHT11 driver you gave from this link: > http://szte-wsn.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/szte-wsn/tinyos/tos/lib/Mts400/ > and tried to compile my application but I got the following errors: > > In interface `I2CPacket': > /opt/tinyos-2.1.0/tos/interfaces/I2CPacket.nc:63: syntax error before > `flags' > /opt/tinyos-2.1.0/tos/interfaces/I2CPacket.nc:79: syntax error before > `flags' > In component `Adg715ControlC': > Adg715ControlC.nc:55: syntax error before `TI2CBasicAddr' > Adg715ControlC.nc:71: cannot find `I2CPacket' > ... > In component `Atm128I2CMasterPacketP': > /opt/tinyos-2.1.0/tos/chips/atm128/i2c/Atm128I2CMasterPacketP.nc:128: > conflicting types for `I2CPacket.read' > /opt/tinyos-2.1.0/tos/interfaces/I2CPacket.nc(Atm128I2CMasterPacketP):63: > previous declaration of `I2CPacket.read' > /opt/tinyos-2.1.0/tos/chips/atm128/i2c/Atm128I2CMasterPacketP.nc:179: > conflicting types for `I2CPacket.write' > /opt/tinyos-2.1.0/tos/interfaces/I2CPacket.nc(Atm128I2CMasterPacketP):79: > previous declaration of `I2CPacket.write' > In component `HplAdg715C': > HplAdg715C.nc:65: cannot find `I2CPacket' > In component `HalSensirionSht11C': > HalSensirionSht11C.nc:55: no match > make: *** [exe0] Error 1 > > I don't understand why I got this error in the I2CPacket interface. Help! > > Patrick > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Miklos Maroti <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Mark, >> >> They work for iris so I guess it works for the micaz (which is >> essentially the same except for the radio). >> >> Miklos >> >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Mark Patrick Cabrera >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Miklos, >> > >> > I checked the files that you linked but I guess these are for the telosb >> > platform. Can I use it in micaz? >> > >> > Patrick >> > >> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Miklos Maroti >> > <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi! >> >> >> >> You might want to look at the SHT11 driver for the MTS400 on the >> >> tinyos-2.x tree here: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://szte-wsn.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/szte-wsn/tinyos/tos/lib/Mts400/ >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Miklos >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Michael Schippling <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > If those are the pins that work with the MTS400, >> >> > once you've found the right definitions thereof, >> >> > they should work with your board. The schematic >> >> > you ref'd wasn't there for me so I can't check. >> >> > >> >> > It's looking a bit like this is an I2C interface, >> >> > in which case I'd closely check the impl code. >> >> > The I2C for the iris is implemented in software >> >> > on a fairly advisory level, e.g. it doesn't deal >> >> > with wait states. I haven't used it anywhere else. >> >> > >> >> > MS >> >> > >> >> > Mark Patrick Cabrera wrote: >> >> >> Thank you for your reply. >> >> >> In any case, here is my problem. I am trying to make a revised >> >> >> sensorboard that will run on a micaz mote. I have "wired" the SHT11 >> >> >> pins >> >> >> based on the HplSensirionSht11C but the sensor seems not to work >> >> >> properly. So I tried to debug by retracing the "wiring" of the >> >> >> MTS400 >> >> >> sensorboard. >> >> >> >> >> >> So if I assume that PortE7 is the correct connection for the SHT11 >> >> >> DATA >> >> >> pin (i.e., DATA = HplAtm128GeneralIOC.PortE7), where should I >> >> >> connect >> >> >> the SCK and the PWR pins so as to interface an SHT11 sensor without >> >> >> using an MTS400 sensorboard? >> >> >> >> >> >> Patrick >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Michael Schippling >> >> >> <[email protected] >> >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Rather than believing the comments, which are such a rarity >> >> >> in the grad-student code base, one should look for where the >> >> >> pin is actually defined...which seems to be wrong anyway... >> >> >> at least in my T1 tree, >> >> >> platform/mica/hardware.h says INT3==D3 >> >> >> but >> >> >> platform/mica2/hardware.h says INT3==E7 >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm not sure what platform you are on but I'd bet E7 is the >> >> >> right >> >> >> pin connection, even if it is the wrong name. There's no >> >> >> explanation >> >> >> for why "they" renamed the pin. If you look at the ATMEGA >> >> >> manual, >> >> >> the official INT3 is in fact D3, and E7 is INT7... >> >> >> >> >> >> MS >> >> >> >> >> >> Mark Patrick Cabrera wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I retraced the "wiring" of the SHT11 of the MTS400 >> >> >> sensorboard >> >> >> and found this in ~/xbow/tos/sensorboards/mts400: >> >> >> #define HUMIDITY_SET_CLOCK() TOSH_SET_PW3_PIN() // >> >> >> sbi(PORTC, 3) >> >> >> #define HUMIDITY_CLEAR_CLOCK() TOSH_CLR_PW3_PIN() // >> >> >> cbi(PORTC, 3) >> >> >> #define HUMIDITY_SET_DATA() TOSH_SET_INT3_PIN() // >> >> >> sbi(PORTD, 3) >> >> >> #define HUMIDITY_CLEAR_DATA() TOSH_CLR_INT3_PIN() // >> >> >> cbi(PORTD, 3) >> >> >> #define HUMIDITY_MAKE_DATA_OUTPUT() >> >> >> TOSH_MAKE_INT3_OUTPUT() >> >> >> // sbi(DDRD, 3) >> >> >> #define HUMIDITY_MAKE_DATA_INPUT() TOSH_MAKE_INT3_INPUT() >> >> >> //cbi(DDRD, 3) >> >> >> >> >> >> Does this mean that the DATA pin of the SHT11 is connected >> >> >> in >> >> >> _PortD3_ and the SCK to PortC3? >> >> >> >> >> >> If the answer is yes, why does the schematic diagram of the >> >> >> MTS400 >> >> >> <www.xbow.com/support/.../MTS-MDA_Series_Users_Manual.pdf >> >> >> >> >> >> <http://www.xbow.com/support/.../MTS-MDA_Series_Users_Manual.pdf> >> >> >> >> >> >> <http://www.xbow.com/support/.../MTS-MDA_Series_Users_Manual.pdf>> >> >> >> shows that the DATA pin of SHT11 is connected to INT3 >> >> >> (_PortE7 >> >> >> of the Atm128L_)? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Can someone clarify to me this thing? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Mark Patrick Cabrera >> >> >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> <mailto:[email protected] >> >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi everyone! I am having a problem interfacing an SHT11 >> >> >> sensor into >> >> >> a Micaz mote. >> >> >> >> >> >> From the SensirionShtLogicP.nc, I got a return FAIL >> >> >> message >> >> >> from >> >> >> these lines: >> >> >> error_t waitForResponse() { >> >> >> call DATA.makeInput(); >> >> >> call DATA.set(); >> >> >> call CLOCK.set(); >> >> >> if (call DATA.get()) { >> >> >> // the device didn't pull the DATA line low >> >> >> // the command wasn't received or acknowledged >> >> >> return FAIL; >> >> >> } >> >> >> call CLOCK.clr(); >> >> >> return SUCCESS; >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> Retracing the wiring of the DATA interface, I found from >> >> >> HalSensirionSht11C.nc that: >> >> >> SensirionSht11LogicP.DATA -> HplSensirionSht11C.DATA; >> >> >> >> >> >> Now I'm not sure if I got the right connection for the >> >> >> DATA >> >> >> interface. This is my revised code of the >> >> >> HplSensirionSht11C: >> >> >> configuration HplSensirionSht11C { >> >> >> provides interface Resource[ uint8_t id ]; >> >> >> provides interface GeneralIO as DATA; >> >> >> provides interface GeneralIO as SCK; >> >> >> provides interface Interrupt as InterruptDATA; >> >> >> } >> >> >> implementation { >> >> >> components HplAtm128GeneralIOC; >> >> >> // components new Msp430GpioC() as DATAM; >> >> >> // components new Msp430GpioC() as SCKM; >> >> >> // components new Msp430GpioC() as PWRM; >> >> >> >> >> >> // components new HplAtm128GeneralIOPinP() as DATAM; >> >> >> // components new HplAtm128GeneralIOPinP() as SCKM; >> >> >> // components new HplAtm128GeneralIOPinP() as PWRM; >> >> >> >> >> >> // DATAM -> HplAtm128GeneralIOC.PortE7; >> >> >> // SCKM -> HplAtm128GeneralIOC.PortC3; >> >> >> // PWRM -> HplAtm128GeneralIOC.PortC0; >> >> >> DATA = HplAtm128GeneralIOC.PortE7; >> >> >> SCK = HplAtm128GeneralIOC.PortC3; >> >> >> // DATA = DATAM; >> >> >> // SCK = SCKM; >> >> >> >> >> >> components HplSensirionSht11P; >> >> >> HplSensirionSht11P.PWR -> HplAtm128GeneralIOC.PortC0; >> >> >> HplSensirionSht11P.DATA -> HplAtm128GeneralIOC.PortE7; >> >> >> HplSensirionSht11P.SCK -> HplAtm128GeneralIOC.PortC3; >> >> >> ... >> >> >> >> >> >> Can someone help me check if I got the connections right? >> >> >> I >> >> >> revised >> >> >> these codes from the application that uses Msp430 (telos) >> >> >> instead >> >> >> Atm128 (micaz) >> >> >> >> >> >> Thank you in advance for those who will help. >> >> >> >> >> >> Mark Patrick Cabrera >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Patrick >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Tinyos-help mailing list >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Tinyos-help mailing list >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > >> >> > https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help >> >> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
