Thanks very much again. Now I am having another question: are the values acquired by reading RSSI_VAL register supposed to be the same as those retrieved using CC2420Packet.getRssi()? Because when I compare a same application with the two methods, the RSSI I get are actually different.
On 5 August 2010 06:00, C L <[email protected]> wrote: > yes, it's not a must. i used this technique in my early days in TOS 'cos i > didn't know otherwise :) but, i find it tidy to have easily identifiable > files in your program folder when referencing it after few months. i guess u > can wire it straight away in ur main configuration file, and adding some > clear comments would do it, too. > > > > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Peng Du <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks very much for your reply. >> >> I am curious that why it is necessary to create my own configuration file? >> Can't I simply call the ReadRssi from CC2420ControlC? >> >> >> >> On 4 August 2010 10:58, C L <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> i posted the following just 10 mins ago. i think it answers ur question >>> as it isn't based on a per packet basis. >>> >>> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg34467.html >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
