Hi, I'm also confused. Looking forward to detailed explanation.
Best Regards, Ruitao Xu 在 2011年4月11日 上午10:07，许长亮 <[email protected]>写道： > Hi: > > I am confued by the following keyword "atomic": > > > message_t* receive(message_t *msg, void *payload, uint8_t len) { > message_t *ret = msg; > > atomic { > if (!uartFull) > { > ret = uartQueue[uartIn]; > uartQueue[uartIn] = msg; > ... > } > ... > } > > I think the context of these codes excute is "task specific ", no interrupt > occurs. so there is no need to use the keyword "atomic". any on give me a > shorter explanation？ thanks! > > > Best regards! > > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Tinyos-help mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help > -- Be Your Personal Best!
_______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
