Yes, we would like to build a cheap platform with all sensors assembled directly to the board.
El 02/03/2012, a les 12:48, Eric Decker va escriure: > > So it is an exercise to port tinyos to a cheap platform? > > shouldn't be too bad. > > 2012/3/2 Marc Barceló <[email protected]> > Thanks Mr Decker, > > That is right, differences in hardware capabilities can be a serious problem > for any tinyOS implementation. > The motivation is to build a "home-made" mote installing all components > ourselves (sensors, microcontrollers…). > > > El 02/03/2012, a les 12:16, Eric Decker va escriure: > >> >> >> 2012/3/2 Marc Barceló <[email protected]> >> Hello to everyone, >> >> Has anyone installed TinyOS on a Arduino UNO platform succesfully? I have to >> move from Iris to this platform and I would like to continue using TinyOS >> instead of the Arduino language since I think it is more powerful, >> especially in networking issues. >> >> The 2 platforms are very different. So you will be challenged. I >> question the reasonableness of the port. >> >> The Iris platform uses ATmega 1281 which has 128K flash and 8K RAM while the >> UNO uses the 328 which only has 32K flash and 2K SRAM. >> >> Not really worth the effort. Not enough code space, especially if what you >> are interested in is the network code (especially the 6lowpan code which is >> where most of the current network effort is being focused). >> >> So why do you have to move to the UNO? >> >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Marc >> _______________________________________________ >> Tinyos-help mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric B. Decker >> Senior (over 50 :-) Researcher >> >> > > > > > -- > Eric B. Decker > Senior (over 50 :-) Researcher > >
_______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
