Hi, I am not skilled in using Avrora, but I think the problem you are dealing with might be due to staggering you are using, I am not sure what is the cycle duration you are using, but as I know the staggering you are using turns the motes on sequentially at 0, 1*Stagger_time, 2*Stagger_time and ... 10*Stagger_time, this means node 10 will turn on later than the node 0 and therefore send less packets, I can suggest you either lower the staggering time or do the simulations for a longer time, for better observations I suggest you keep track of the number of transmissions done by each mote, Please let me know if this was the case,
Regards, Hamid Rafiei Karkvandi On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Maycon Maia Vitali < [email protected]> wrote: > 2012/8/21 Christian Haas <[email protected]> > >> Receiving is more expensive than just having the radio on, so more nodes >> sending -> more receiving -> more energy consumed. >> > > > Yes. But when I have just 2 nodes sending in broadcast the result is > 16,8212438540, and when I have 11 nodes sending in broadcast the result is > 16,4880731899. I'm seeing "more nodes sending -> more receive -> less > energy consumed", that makes no sense. > > ---- > *Maycon Maia Vitali* (aka 0ut0fBound) > Offensive Security Certified Expert (OSCE) > Security Researcher @ Hack'n Roll > http://www.hacknroll.com <http://maycon.hacknroll.com/> > Hack'n Roll > > PGP key *ID*: F23985E2 > <http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC5F958A9F23985E2> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinyos-help mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help >
_______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
