Hi John,

RF212 has been successfully used by Branislav Kusy in Australia for
cattle tagging and tracking. As far as I know, it was a dual radio
setup (RF230 and RF212), but you can get RF212 working together with
RFA1 too. They reported around 2 km range. You should search research
papers from CSIRO and cattle tracking.

Best,
Miklos

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:44 AM, András Bíró <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> There's no gcc support for 8051, and - as far as I know - that's a
> dealbreaker with nesc/tinyos.
>
> However, we're using Atmel's AT86RF212, and it's quite stable (We
> fixed some bugs in it in the last half year, with the help of Miklos
> Maroti). Unfortunatly, we're in Europe, so we can only use it on the
> 868MHz band, with reduced power, but it's still better in some places
> then 2.4GHz. The rf212 is much more integrated then the CC1000 family,
> it does almost anything for 802.15.4 MAC.
>
> We're also experimenting with Silab's SI4432 radio, which is a low
> level radio, like the CC1000, but the driver is not quite ready yet
> (you can find it at https://github.com/mmaroti/tinyos/tree/si443x),
> but we're going to work a lot with it soon, so it will probably work
> in one-two months. We're also planning to replace it with si446x, but
> I don't know when.
>
> Both of these radios are using the rfxlink stack.
>
> Antennas:
> We're using this chip for on-board antennas:
> http://hu.farnell.com/johanson-technology/0868at43a0020e/antenna-ceramic-868mhz/dp/1885493
> Or if we need external antenna, we're usually using standard European
> GSM (900/1800/2100MHz) antennas.
> We prefer omnipolar antennas, so we don't know anything about dipoles
>
>
> Andras Biro
>
> Unicomp Ltd.
> ucmote.unicomp.hu
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:44 PM, John Griessen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm going to be making some tinyos nodes for field biologists using
>> the old telosb design slightly modified, but after that batch,
>> I'd like to make something better for frequencies like the CC1101 
>> transceivers use:
>> 315, 433, 868, and 915 MHz.  A few years ago David Moss emailed this list 
>> often with
>> talk about using those frequencies, but I don't see him talking lately, is 
>> anyone else using
>> 433 or 915 MHz bands for tinyos?  I'd like to know if so.  I'm wondering how 
>> difficult the testing
>> and all for a folded dipole for 433 or 915 MHz is and what is out there 
>> already.
>>
>> In reading about antennas, I like the folded dipole as used on CC2500 
>> reference designs since
>> it is matched to the transceiver output impedance so you don't need a balun 
>> circuit and have
>> fewer parts and inherent good coupling to the antenna for true low power.  
>> So, another question
>> I have is, "Is there an open platform based on the cc2500, and if so, it 
>> probably uses a MSP430
>> for the tinyos code rather than the internal 8051 MCU of the CC2500, and if 
>> so, which one?
>>
>> The msp430f5438A platform mm5t, (https://github.com/MamMark/mm.git), 
>> mentions using
>> the CC2420, which costs 2X as much as a CC2500, and doesn't have a folded 
>> dipole ref design,
>> so not as desirable...
>>
>>
>> John Griessen
>> --
>> Ecosensory
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tinyos-help mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-help mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help

_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help

Reply via email to