On 12/27/2013 11:39 PM, Eric Decker wrote:
> Well sort of.
>
> The LS Research module (lsrdev) is a combined msp4305437a coupled with a 
> cc2520/cc2591 radio combination.
It is FCC certified.

Even though the radio setup code can be written by the usual TinyOS user?
That's against the intent of the FCC rules unless the setup is in a separate 
code
that is not easily changed.  The FCC rules allow split modular radios
to be certified in groups for manufacturing cost benefits like Ciseco's XRF.  
Several different
microcontrollers with different firmware only are tested with the same 
transceiver implementation
as a group to operate at their different carrier frequencies such as 315, 450, 
900 and 868MHz,
and each can then have an FCC certified label for one frequency.

If the microcontroller and radio are not part of the same printed circuit the 
FCC requires
some physical keying or firmware signatures
that do not let them function with anything but the original carrier frequency 
as they are labelled.

Is TinyOS FCC certifiable as to being "difficult for the user to change the 
carrier frequency?
IS that how LS Research has an FCC certified tag?

If so, great, but I'd still rather have a completely separate radio setup done 
by another inexpensive
ultra low power microcontroller from the one running TinyOS, and not possible 
to reflash it easily so
it qualifies for many FCC certified applications.
>
> However we don't talk to it as a seperate multi-processor but rather I put 
> TinyOS down onto the module itself.

Splitting the radio setup from the main microcontroller, or as you say, "talk 
to it as a separate multi-processor",
allows FCC certified radio modules that many platforms can benefit from.  I'll 
be figuring how to use
Ciseco XRF modules as separate multi-processor handling radio setup, or prove 
it not feasible
with TinyOS some day, probably in 2014, when I have a little budget for it.

I may have to drop TinyOS for my system plans at first in order to get a 
product out, then add it
later with profits to spend.  I'm wanting to create terrestrial field radio 
stations with rainproof
enclosures and solar power, with coarse grained modules: solar, battery, 
868/900MHz radio, power prioritization,
data logging and mesh networking controller with ADC and thermocouple sensors 
on board, and let
other sensor boards be custom made to fit in the same physical module as the 
networking controller,
or as separate stackable enclosure modules with radio on top and GPS on a 2nd 
from top side stalk
separated at least 1.5 radio wavelengths.  An alternative GPS module could have 
the GPS antenna just
stick out minimally to the side, and never be on at the same time as the mesh 
networking radio transmits, since
I doubt receiving would be affected so much by nearby antennas.
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help

Reply via email to