I tend to agree with your comment, but leaving outside the kind of support
requests you mentioned, I still have hopes for TinyOS. Right now it does not
feel as a vibrant, active community. On top of that our public facing
information is often incorrect or incomplete, just try to install it by
following TinyOS web site and see where it would get you.
I believe that our work products should be usable by others. With the potential
of all-things-embedded, or Internet of Things, or whatever you want to call it,
TinyOS will not be successful if we forget this.
Rahav Dor
On Thursday, January 9, 2014 9:12 AM, Saeid Yazdani <[email protected]> wrote:
TinyOS is not ment to have support. A researcher at least in the case of
embedded systems or WSN PhD position should not need any support...I see many
people here who are researchers and they don't know basic C programming.
I agree that support is a good thing but people shouldn't relay on others to
cut out the work for them. Kust y thoughts...
On 9 Jan 2014 16:04, "Rahav Dor (yahoo)" <[email protected]> wrote:
You should also consider support. I've been using TinyOS for research purposes
for a while and I can tell you that it seems like a dying product. Or at least
one, that not too many people care about. It takes days if not longer to get a
response on this forum.
>
>
>I do not know how Contiki is doing in this respect, but if this continues, the
>my current project is going to be the last on TinyOS.
>
>
>Rahav Dor
>_______________________________________________
>Tinyos-help mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
>
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
