On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:40:59PM -0500, Jon Paul Maloy wrote:
> I don't know much about Python, but it looks ok
> to me, according to your description.
Thanks!
> Yo may have noticed that TIPC_ADDR_NAMESEQ
> and TIPC_ADDR_MCAST in reality indicates the same
> address type, i.e. they have the same value.
>
> Maybe that will simplify your code a little ?
I actually haven't noticed!
It doesn't simplify the code much, as I already support NAMESEQ, but it
simplifies the conditionals a bit.
Unless anybody has an objection (e.g. it shouldn't be used in new code
anymore), I think I'll leave the constant exported just in case somebody
is attached to it, because the benefit of removing it is really small,
but add a small notice in the documentation about it being the same as
NAMESEQ.
Thanks,
Alberto
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
