Still weird that this starts happening now, when this issue is supposed to be 
remedied, and not earlier, when it wasn't.
We really need that "permit overlapping publications"  solution I have been 
preaching about.

Br
///jon


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rune Torgersen [mailto:ru...@innovsys.com]
> Sent: Friday, 18 March, 2016 10:25
> To: 'Erik Hugne'
> Cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] tipc nametable update problem
> 
> Yes I have.
> There are quite a few at the same time like this:
> 
> Mar 17 20:08:58 restarttv kernel: Dropping name table update (0) of 
> {1853110816,
> 1952998688, 1801810542} from <1.1.1> key=1633905523
> Mar 17 20:08:58 restarttv kernel: Dropping name table update (0) of 
> {542000723,
> 544613732, 544437616} from <1.1.1> key=167800175
> Mar 17 20:08:58 restarttv kernel: Dropping name table update (0) of 
> {544239474,
> 1953325424, 543582572} from <1.1.1> key=1930035237
> Mar 17 20:08:58 restarttv kernel: Dropping name table update (0) of 
> {1933189232,
> 1869771885, 1634738291} from <1.1.1> key=1768843040
> Mar 17 20:08:58 restarttv kernel: Dropping name table update (0) of 
> {1717660012,
> 1701054976, 628308512} from <1.1.1> key=1869881446
> Mar 17 20:08:58 restarttv kernel: Dropping name table update (0) of {16397,
> 1073741824, 16397} from <1.1.1> key=29285
> Mar 17 20:08:58 restarttv kernel: Dropping name table update (0) of 
> {1633943667,
> 1752134260, 544367969} from <1.1.1> key=1679834144
> Mar 17 20:08:58 restarttv kernel: Dropping name table update (0) of 
> {1869771808,
> 2003986804, 1698300018} from <1.1.1> key=4294915584
> Mar 17 20:08:58 restarttv kernel: Dropping name table update (0) of 
> {1073741824,
> 65279, 4294902016} from <1.1.1> key=1073741824
> Mar 17 20:08:58 restarttv kernel: Dropping name table update (0) of {65279,
> 4294901760, 59154} from <1.1.1> key=65023
> 
> 
> From: Erik Hugne [mailto:erik.hu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 1:48 AM
> To: Rune Torgersen
> Cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] tipc nametable update problem
> 
> 
> Hi Rune.
> When the problem occurs, have you seen any traces like "tipc: Dropping name
> table update...." ?
> 
> //E
> On Mar 18, 2016 02:11, "Rune Torgersen"
> <ru...@innovsys.com<mailto:ru...@innovsys.com>> wrote:
> More info.
> The failing ports are all opened as TIPC_ZONE_SCOPE.
> Addresses of the two computers are 1.1.1 and 1.1.2.
> 
> If I change the open param to TIPC_CLUSTER_SCOPE, the nametable seems to
> update correctly.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rune Torgersen
> [mailto:ru...@innovsys.com<mailto:ru...@innovsys.com>]
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 7:06 PM
> To: 'tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:tipc-
> discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net>'
> Subject: [tipc-discussion] tipc nametable update problem
> 
> Hi.
> 
> The product I work on uses TIPC for communication between different
> computers on a network. We've actually been using older version (1.7.7 and 
> older
> ) for nearly 10 years.
> 
> On a new product, we're using the latest Ubuntu server (16.04, still in beta) 
> using
> kernel 4.4.0.
> 
> On several occasions now, after boot, programs that open TIPC sockets during
> the boot process, have ports that does not show in the nametable on the other
> computer. This of course causes the programs to not being able to talk.
> If we restart the program, reopening the TIPC port, then it shows up on both
> sides.
> 
> 
> I know this is somewhat sparse info, but I am not sure where to start to look 
> at
> this.
> 
> One piece of info that might be useful, is that we kind of require the old 
> interface
> naming on  our interfaces, so we have turned off systemd's ethernet naming
> scheme, and use udev to name the devices.
> 
> This should be done well before we initializer the tipc driver  module and 
> give it a
> netid and address and enable the bearer links.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Transform Data into Opportunity.
> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> Click to learn more.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> tipc-discussion mailing list
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:tipc-
> discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Transform Data into Opportunity.
> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> Click to learn more.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> tipc-discussion mailing list
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:tipc-
> discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Transform Data into Opportunity.
> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> Click to learn more.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> tipc-discussion mailing list
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to