>> For UDP bearer, it seems insufficient for us to check MTU size only
>> when UDP bearer is enabled. Meanwhile, we should update MTU size for
>> UDP bearer with Path MTU discovery protocol once MTU size is changed
>> after bearer is enabled.
> I should admit I'm not that familiar with tipc. Do you mean updating
> b->mtu in response to PMTU updates of the route used for ub->ubsock?


> The way I understand it, it would be certainly useful but it's not
> directly related to the security issue this patch addresses as if there
> are no updates, b->mtu cannot get too low and there is no risk of
> a buffer overflow. In other words, reflecting PMTU updates is something
> that can be IMHO left for later.



>                                                       Michal Kubecek

tipc-discussion mailing list

Reply via email to